Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Atypical local and global biological motion perception in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Elife · 2024 · PMC11219041 · PMID 38954462

3
hedged sentences
0.0730
closest p · 1.5× alpha
0.0730
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp=0.073so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In the ADHD group, we observed a significant difference in the effect of age on ACC between BM-Local and BM-General (standardised β 5 =0.462, p<0.001) and marginally significant differences in the effect of age on ACC between BM-Local and BM-Global (standardised β 4 =0.228, p=0.073).

also in 26,082 other papers

a trend towards significanceno p-value reported
Second, as I currently understand the reported model results, the fact that ß4 (representing the difference in relationship to SRS scores between task 2 and task 1; the authors refer to ß3 here although I assume they mean ß4) is negative and shows a trend towards significance would actually mean the relationship between BM processing accuracy and SRS scores is more negative for task 2 relative to task 1 and not, as the authors state, that the correlation with SRS scores is greater for task 1.

also in 2,760 other papers

showed a trendno p-value reported
The values of ß4 (representing the difference in relationship to SRS scores between BM-Global and BM-Local) and ß5 (representing the difference in relationship to SRS scores between BM-General and BM-Local) were positive and showed a trend towards significance, indicating that the correlations with SRS total score were more negative for BM-Local relative to BM-Global and BM-General: “A general linear model was constructed (Table S2, Model 4): SRS = β0 + β1 * ACC + β2 * D1 + β3 * D2 + β4 * (ACC * D1) + β5 * (ACC * D2).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.