Barely Significant
← all excerpts

The time course of semantic ambiguity in visual word recognition: behavioral and ERP evidence for the lexical-semantic effect.

Front Psychol · 2024 · PMC11263298 · PMID 39045435

3
hedged sentences
0.0040
closest p · 0.1× alpha
0.0580
boldest claim

The sentences

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.004actually significant
Although the Ambiguity effect in HF words did not reach statistical significance, the difference between control and homonym words in LF words showed earlier onset compared to the main effect of Ambiguity, from 668 ms to 996 ms (cluster p = 0.004).

also in 17,681 other papers

failed to reach significancep = 0.058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Although the main effect of Ambiguity failed to reach significance, a critical interaction of Frequency and Ambiguity showed trend-toward-significance [ b = 0.007, SE = 0.003, t = 1.93, p = 0.058].

also in 515 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
Results Behavioral results indicated a marginally significant interaction between word frequency and semantic ambiguity along with a main effect of word frequency, showing faster and more accurate responses for high-frequency words.

also in 3,965 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.