marginally significantp = 0.06
There was also a marginally significant improvement in the 6 min run test, with the distance covered increasing from 943.88 ± 195.19 to 959.73 ± 234.02 m ( p = 0.06). 4.
There was also a marginally significant improvement in the 6 min run test, with the distance covered increasing from 943.88 ± 195.19 to 959.73 ± 234.02 m ( p = 0.06). 4.
Although the improvement in aerobic endurance did not reach statistical significance, this observation highlights the need for either a longer intervention period or an increased aerobic component within the program to achieve more pronounced aerobic improvements.