In our cohort the total implantation time did not differ significantly between the cephalic and subclavian vein access group; however, there was a strong trend toward longer implantation times when cephalic access failed and SVP was used as a bail‐out—this was primarily triggered by longer time to first lead placement.
← all excerpts
Safety and Efficiency of Cephalic Vein Puncture by Modified Seldinger Technique Compared to Subclavian Vein Puncture for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.
1
—
—