Barely Significant
← all phrases

a strong trend

688 sentences · 688 papers · 7,242 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Although the groups showed a strong trend of decreasing MoM with increasing weight ( p < 0.001; Jonckheere’s test), individual comparisons among the three groups (without regard to the ordering of categories) found no real difference between ELBW and VLBW ( p = 0.201; Steel-Dwass multiple comparison procedure) while each of the two lower groups both differed from the LBW group ( p < 0.001 for each; Steel-Dwass).
a strong trendP = 0.0280.6× alphagold
Finally, the index for the (correct) answer “machine” in the machine condition was either significantly higher or with a strong trend in controls (2.6 ± 0.6) compared to both patient subgroups (DoC = 0.5 ± 0.2, U = 56.5, P = 0.028, η 2 = 0.17; NoDoC = 0.4 ± 0.1, U = 51, P = 0.014, η 2 = 0.21).
a strong trendp = .051.0× alphagold
In the data analyzed here, we did not observe any marked differences in effects when adding meditation status ( n = 6) as a covariate, but the shift in the NREM gamma band from a strong trend (uncorrected p = .05) to a significant effect in the regression analysis corrected for meditation status ( p .=011) indicated that meditation practice might indeed mask the strength of the effect in the NREM-gamma band.
a strong trendp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Statistical analysis comparing Sham and DA lesioned rats showed a main effect of the lesion on PSD thickness (Mean ± SEM Sham = 43.84 ± 1.49 nm; Partial = 34.53 ± 1.13 nm; Total = 37.49 ± 1.25 nm; KW[2, 357] = 28.18; p < 0.0001) and a strong trend toward an effect on PSD length (Mean ± SEM Sham = 427.30 ± 17.75 nm; Partial = 372.20 ± 14.52 nm; Total = 396.10 ± 15.84 nm; KW[2, 357] = 5.73; p = 0.05).
a strong trendp=0.051.0× alphagold
Multivariable linear regression Satisfaction with surgery In model 1, we found a lower postoperative satisfaction with a higher postoperative angle (β=−0.91 per degree, 95 % CI −1.55 to –0.27, p=0.007), higher postoperative diplopia (β=−0.23 per unit score, 95 % CI −0.43 to –0.02, p=0.03) and a strong trend with higher levels of anxiety (β=−1.85 per unit score, 95 % CI −3.74 to 0.04, p=0.05).