Mitral annulus disjunction in consecutive patients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Where is the boundary between normality and disease?

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson · 2024 · PMC11334631 · PMID 38971502

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0700

boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significancep = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Patients with MAD ≥6 mm showed a trend toward a higher likelihood of the study endpoint than patients without, however with borderline significance (6.7% vs 1.2%; p = 0.07; Fig. 3 ).

also in 7,017 other papers

showed a trendp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The presence of MAD ≥1 mm (0.9% vs 1.8%; p = 0.46), MAD ≥4 mm (1.6% vs 1.3%; p = 0.87), or MVP (3.5% vs 1.2%; p = 0.32) were not associated with the study endpoint, whereas patients with MAD ≥6 mm showed a trend toward a higher likelihood of the study endpoint (6.7% vs 1.2%; p = 0.07).

also in 53,322 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.