Enhancing response inhibition behavior through tDCS intervention in college students with smartphone addiction.

The interaction between time and group was not significant ( F (1,76) = 1.085, p > 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.014), and the triple interaction involving time, tDCS type, and group also failed to reach statistical significance ( F (1,76) = 0.441, p > 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.006).

also in 805 other papers

A marginally significant difference in SSRT was noted between the two groups at T1 ( t (38) = 1.891, p = 0.066, Cohen's d = 0.61).

also in 3,399 other papers