showed a trendp = 0.05
p < 0.1) and showed a trend that was not significant after multiple testing correction for DSS + SDH1 (Wald test, p = 0.05; adj. p = 0.42).
p < 0.1) and showed a trend that was not significant after multiple testing correction for DSS + SDH1 (Wald test, p = 0.05; adj. p = 0.42).
Although there were no significant variations in the colon weight/length ratio between the treatment groups at the sacrifice of the mice, differences between ENT and SDH1, as well as Sb.P and SDH1, were borderline significant.