Although rates of MACE were numerically lower with OCT compared to conventional angiography, this did not reach statistical significance (OR: 0.91 [95% CrI: 0.62 to 1.39]) ( Fig. 3 ; Table 3 ).
← all excerpts
Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
1
—
—