marginally significantp = 0.066
Second, when analyzed separately for each group, the correlation was marginally significant for GII ( ρ = 0.346; N = 29; p = 0.066) and not significant for GI ( ρ = −0.042; N = 14; p = 0.892).
Second, when analyzed separately for each group, the correlation was marginally significant for GII ( ρ = 0.346; N = 29; p = 0.066) and not significant for GI ( ρ = −0.042; N = 14; p = 0.892).
Additionally, there was a significant trend in the difference in the effect sizes between the two Δ SVs [ d’ of Δ SV( O = L ) minus d’ of Δ SV( O = R )] across the three groups of trials (one-way repeated-measures ANOVA; F (2,94) = 54.867; p < 0.001; Page trend test; L = 642; p < 0.001).