Subsidence Rates Associated With Porous 3D-Printed Versus Solid Titanium Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Global Spine J · 2024 · PMC11418593 · PMID 36786680

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.2300

closest p · 4.6× alpha

0.3900

boldest claim

The sentences

an overall trendP = .23not close (p > 0.1)

However, there was an overall trend towards higher rates of revision surgery within the ST cage cohort (12.9% vs 5.6%, P = .23).

also in 1,064 other papers

did not reach statistical significanceP = .39not close (p > 0.1)

While the interval until reoperation was 25.6 months for the ST versus 15.6 months for the 3DPT group, this comparison did not reach statistical significance, likely due to low revision rates ( P = .39).

also in 17,681 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.