showed a trendp = 0.057
2c ) but showed a trend for larger litters compared with native backcrosses (native x immigrant F1-F4 pairs; t = 1.9, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−0.18, 2.02]; Fig. 2c ) although not statistically significant.
2c ) but showed a trend for larger litters compared with native backcrosses (native x immigrant F1-F4 pairs; t = 1.9, p = 0.057, 95% CI [−0.18, 2.02]; Fig. 2c ) although not statistically significant.