showed a trendp <0.00001
Using rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD −3.95 mmol/mol [−0.36 pp], 95% CI −5.46, −2.44 mmol/mol; p <0.00001) than using isCGM (MD −1.79 mmol/mol [−0.16 pp], 95% CI −5.28, 1.69 mmol/mol; p =0.31).
Using rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD −3.95 mmol/mol [−0.36 pp], 95% CI −5.46, −2.44 mmol/mol; p <0.00001) than using isCGM (MD −1.79 mmol/mol [−0.16 pp], 95% CI −5.28, 1.69 mmol/mol; p =0.31).