only marginally significantp =0.055
The same was seen in SCA2, though only marginally significant, probably due to the low number of patients (Spearman rho=-0.67, CI:0.92,-0.04, p =0.055).
The same was seen in SCA2, though only marginally significant, probably due to the low number of patients (Spearman rho=-0.67, CI:0.92,-0.04, p =0.055).