Online transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals dynamic interactions between language control and processing in bilingual language production.

Additionally, the two-way interaction between the Trial type and TW showed a marginal significance ( F = 2.01, P = 0.050).

also in 1,112 other papers

For repeat trials, the effect of TMS was marginally significant when stimulating the rIFG in TW5 ( t = 1.70, P = 0.089) but not in TW1, TW2, and TW4 ( t < 1; t = 1.38, P = 0.168; t < 1).

also in 5,089 other papers

For switch trials, the effect of TMS showed significance when stimulating the rIFG in TW2 ( t = −2.98, P = 0.003) and TW5 ( t = −2.38, P = 0.018), with marginal significance in TW4 ( t = −1.76, P = 0.078) and a nonsignificant trend in TW1 ( t = −1.39, P = 0.166).

also in 972 other papers

These indicated that RTs were faster (or showed a trend of being faster) when stimulating the rIFG in TW1, TW2, TW4, and TW5 (952, 974, 988, and 988 ms, respectively) compared to Sham (965, 1,007, 999, and 1020 ms, respectively).

also in 13,339 other papers