marginally significantp =0.052
As shown in Table 3 , Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Table 4 , the ACME of IL-8 was statistically significant for PFS ( p =0.036) and was marginally significant for OS ( p =0.052).
As shown in Table 3 , Supplementary Table 3 and Supplementary Table 4 , the ACME of IL-8 was statistically significant for PFS ( p =0.036) and was marginally significant for OS ( p =0.052).
Consistent with our result from GZBCS mentioned earlier in this paper, breast cancer patients with low IL-8 signaling had better prognosis with marginal significance ( p =0.08, Figure 3A ).
In contrast, the association between IL-8 and breast cancer prognosis did not reach statistical significance among patients with high levels of IL-2 signaling ( p =0.15, Figure 3E ), IL-12 signaling ( p =0.17, Figure 3F ) or IL-7 signaling ( p =0.2, Figure 3G ).