Subgroup analysis indicated that both RT and MT groups displayed a statistically significant difference compared to the control group[RT,MD = 0.79,95%CI:0.05 to 1.52, P = 0.04;MT, MD = 1.01,95%CI:0.45to 1.56, P < 0.01], however, when AT alone was compared to routine treatment, the difference did not reach statistical significance (AT, MD = 0.01,95%CI:-0.57 to 0.60, P = 0.96), as shown in the Fig. 7 .
← all excerpts
Clinical outcome changes in sarcopenic obesity: a meta-analysis of exercise training methods.
1
0.9600
0.9600