43.7% [ n = 142]; adjusted hazards ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.45–0.71), along with a slightly increased risk for bleeding outcomes that did not reach statistical significance (11.1% vs . 8.3%; adjusted hazards ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.82–2.11).
← all excerpts
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs . medical therapy in patients on dialysis with coronary artery disease in China.
1
—
—