Despite CBV values between the two methods being very similar, it was determined that the methods were not correlated [ r = −0.297 (Pearson) and r = −0.266 (Spearman)] as both tests of correlation failed to reach statistical significance [ 25 ].
← all excerpts
Relationship Between Signals from Cerebral near Infrared Spectroscopy Sensor Technology and Objectively Measured Cerebral Blood Volume: A Systematic Scoping Review.
1
—
—