Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparison of orthofix external fixator combined with vascularized fibula graft versus single segmental femoral lengthening for treating femoral defects ≥ 6 cm: a retrospective study.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord · 2025 · PMC11840988 · PMID 39979967

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0730
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp <0.001actually significant
There were highly significant differences ( p <0.001) in operation duration and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups, with the bone - lengthening group showing shorter operation times and less blood loss (presented in Table 1 ).

also in 132,142 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep =0.073so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Although the duration of external fixator use in the FVFG group (16.9 ± 3.52 months) was marginally longer than that in the BL group (15.53 ± 2.09 months), this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p =0.073). 2.Postoperative complications: According to the Paley classification system, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of nail infection, nail loosening, limb edema, nonunion (including nonunion in the BL group and fibula nonunion in the FVFG group), and postoperative fractures.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.