Although the group effect did not reach statistical significance, there were notable improvements in the FTSST, KFES-I, TUG, and FRT values after the treatment (FTSST, ∆E2–E1 PBGT : 1.40 ± 1.35 vs. ∆E2–E1 Control : 1.36 ± 2.35; KFES-I, ∆E2–E1 PBGT : 0.50 ± 1.00 vs. ∆E2–E1 Control : 0.43 ± 1.04; TUG, ∆E2–E1 PBGT : 0.84 ± 0.83 vs. ∆E2–E1 Control : 0.61 ± 1.17; FRT, ∆E2–E1 PBGT : −1.77 ± 2.41 vs. ∆E2–E1 Control : −0.63 ± 3.19).
← all excerpts
Effects of Unpredictable Perturbation Training on a Split-Belt Treadmill on Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1
—
—