Barely Significant
← all excerpts

The hazards of chasing subgroups in neutral stroke trials.

Neurol Res Pract · 2025 · PMC11921980 · PMID 40069910

5
hedged sentences
0.0500
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0510
boldest claim

The sentences

Although the interaction term was significant, the effect of surgery in the superficial group did not quite reach statistical significance (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47–1.01, p > 0.05).

also in 126 other papers

almost significantp = 0.051so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
In STICH, the apparent beneficial effect of surgery in patients with a superficial haematoma was almost significant with p = 0.051 (Table 1 ).

also in 454 other papers

borderline significantno p-value reported
In this scenario, confirming the borderline significant finding requires a substantial increase in sample size relative to the size of the positive subgroup.

also in 2,946 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
This observation is important since the meta-analysis of the population of participants with superficial haematoma in STICH-1 and 2 is marginally significant (Fig. 3 ) and a larger follow-on trial might have given more robust and positive results.

also in 7,110 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.