of marginal significancep = .072
14 Time 2 For implicit measures, the weighted aggregate effect sizes (see Table 5 ) were significant for Test 1 but were only of marginal significance for Test 2 ( p = .072).
14 Time 2 For implicit measures, the weighted aggregate effect sizes (see Table 5 ) were significant for Test 1 but were only of marginal significance for Test 2 ( p = .072).
Correlations among measures Bivariate correlations among all implicit and explicit measures (see Table 2 ) revealed that when examining within‐construct relations between timepoints, all corresponding Time 1 and Time 2 measures of social identity, group norms and behaviour were positively and significantly correlated—with the exception of the implicit measure of behaviour, which, though positive in direction, did not reach conventional levels of significance.
All corresponding explicit scale and VAS measures were positively correlated and highly significant.