marginally significantp =.06
The interaction between experiment and phase was marginally significant, F (1, 34) = 3.07, p =.06, η p 2 = 0.10.
The interaction between experiment and phase was marginally significant, F (1, 34) = 3.07, p =.06, η p 2 = 0.10.
However, our results showed a trend consistent with our hypothesis, suggesting that the results of Experiment 1 cannot be fully explained by MI due to the adaptation of sad facial expressions.