This comparison clearly indicates that the proportion of interventional treatment in the IVUS group was significantly higher than in the FFR group ( P < .001, see Table 2 ).This finding highlights a significant trend toward higher intervention rates in the IVUS group, suggesting differences in the treatment approach between IVUS-guided and FFR-guided strategies.
← all excerpts
Comparative efficacy of intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention.
1
—
—