Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills.

Ann Dyslexia · 2025 · PMC11954693 · PMID 39307875

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0630

closest p · 1.3× alpha

0.0880

boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = 0.063so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Similarly, considering Word Reading, Group was non-significant (β = -0.51, t(40.09) = -0.99, p = 0.326; Cohen's d = 0.32), as well as Age, which only approached significance, suggesting that older participants tended to have a better reading performance (β = 0.14, t(35) = 1.92, p = 0.063; Cohen's d = 0.09).

also in 2,355 other papers

approached significantp = 0.088so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

As for Syllabic Inversion, we found a Group effect in accuracy, with the experimental group performing more poorly than the control group (β = -0.09, t(30.48) = -2.64, p < 0.05; Cohen’s d = 0.86), but no effects of Age (β = 0.00, t(29.14) = 0.36, p = 0.718; Cohen’s d = 0.02), Time (β = -0.03, t(29.15) = -1.11, p = 0.275; Cohen’s d = 0.27), while Group × Time only approached significant (β 0.07, t(29.48) = 1.76, p = 0.088; Cohen’s d = 0.60).

also in 37 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.