a negative trendp < 0.01
Warner’s equation underestimated fat mass compared to DXA (t = 16.9, 95% confidence interval = 3.96–5.02, p < 0.001), while both Evans’s and Warner’s equations exhibited a negative trend ( p < 0.01).
Warner’s equation underestimated fat mass compared to DXA (t = 16.9, 95% confidence interval = 3.96–5.02, p < 0.001), while both Evans’s and Warner’s equations exhibited a negative trend ( p < 0.01).
A positive trend was identified for Warner’s equation in the change in fat mass percentage between T1 and T2 compared to DXA.