a numerical trendp = 0.125
In contrast, although there was a numerical trend toward fewer cases of septic shock in the S-UAS group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.11–1.31; p = 0.125; I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 7 ).
In contrast, although there was a numerical trend toward fewer cases of septic shock in the S-UAS group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.11–1.31; p = 0.125; I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 7 ).
In contrast, although there was a numerical trend toward fewer cases of septic shock in the S-UAS group, the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.11–1.31; p = 0.125; I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 7 ).