Energy efficiency in ROS communication: a comparison across programming languages and workloads.

Front Robot AI · 2025 · PMC11999854 · PMID 40242513

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp = 3.49not a probability at all

The Kruskal–Wallis test for different message intervals shows a highly significant difference for the C++ node, with p = 3.49 × 1 0 − 55 , and for the Python node, with p = 1.98 × 1 0 − 58 .

also in 29,987 other papers

a clear trendno p-value reported

For Python, the measurements are less predictable at high message frequencies (0.05-s and 0.1-s intervals) while we observe a clear trend for other message intervals, with power consumption increasing as the number of clients grows.

also in 5,860 other papers

an unexpected trendno p-value reported

An unexpected trend is observed for both languages, where power consumption and CPU usage decrease as the number of clients increases.

also in 86 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.