In addition to shorter laser times, the 6.3 Fr ureteroscope showed a trend toward higher laser energy efficiency (0.047 mm 3 /J) compared to the 7.5 Fr model (0.035 mm 3 /J), while also demonstrating lower energy consumption (20.89 J/mm 3 vs. 28.34 J/mm 3 , respectively).
← all excerpts
Early clinical outcomes using a 6.3 Fr single use ureteroscope compared to a 7.5 Fr device.
1
—
—