showed a trendP = 0.055
Patients harboring KMT2A::MLLT1 , however, showed a trend towards worse clinical outcomes compared to their counterparts (3-year OS: 32.8% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.055; CIR: 58.8% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.087) (Supplementary Fig.
Patients harboring KMT2A::MLLT1 , however, showed a trend towards worse clinical outcomes compared to their counterparts (3-year OS: 32.8% vs. 60.4%, P = 0.055; CIR: 58.8% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.087) (Supplementary Fig.