Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Exploring "phasic" vs. "tonic" accounts of the effect of switch probability on the auditory attention switch cost.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) · 2025 · PMC12095880 · PMID 38724482

2
hedged sentences
0.0440
closest p · 0.9× alpha
0.0440
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significancep = .044actually significant
For switch trials, there were no significant effects involving SwitchProb, whereas the analysis of repetitions showed an interaction of SwitchProb and RCI which approached significance, F (1, 47) = 4.27, p = .044 (Bonferroni-corrected p = .088), η p 2 = .083.

also in 8,237 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported
Statistical power considerations Given the uncertainty regarding the diagnostic interaction between switch probability, switch cost and RCI in the error analyses in Experiment 1 (it was marginally significant in the ANOVA, but only “anectodal” in the Bayesian test), we sought to augment the statistical power by increasing the number of participants.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.