borderline significantP = 0.053
Likewise, incorporating Log cumulative PHR led to a significant NRI of 0.1163 ( P = 0.011), though its IDI (0.0012) was only borderline significant ( P = 0.053).
Likewise, incorporating Log cumulative PHR led to a significant NRI of 0.1163 ( P = 0.011), though its IDI (0.0012) was only borderline significant ( P = 0.053).
Similarly, adding Log cumulative PHR improved the C-index (0.638, 95% CI: 0.613–0.663) compared to the baseline model (0.634, 95% CI: 0.609–0.660), though these differences did not reach statistical significance ( Supplementary Tables S3, S4 ).