at the limit of significancep = 0.059
For HIT gain, a difference at the limit of significance was found between the change in slopes ( p = 0.059), which did not prompt the use of a model calculating an age-adjusted difference (Fig. 2 ).
For HIT gain, a difference at the limit of significance was found between the change in slopes ( p = 0.059), which did not prompt the use of a model calculating an age-adjusted difference (Fig. 2 ).
Although there was a trend toward a younger age at onset and a longer duration of ataxic symptoms in the ≥ 4 kb subgroup, it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.18 and p = 0.34, respectively).