A trend towards reduced technical success was noted in BAV compared to TAV, but this did not reach statistical significance (aOR = 0.7, 95 % CI 0.49–1.04, p = 0.08) ( Table 3 and Supplementary Table 4 for comparison of individual technical success endpoints).
← all excerpts
Comparative outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis patients: insights from the SWEDEHEART registry.
1
0.0800
0.0800