showed a trendp < 0.00001
In this analysis too, rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD −3.95 mmol/mol [−0.36%]; 95% CI: −5.46 to −2.44, p < 0.00001) than isCGM (MD −1.79 mmol/mol [−0.16%]; 95% CI: −5.28, 1.69, p = 0.31).
In this analysis too, rtCGM showed a trend towards a larger effect (MD −3.95 mmol/mol [−0.36%]; 95% CI: −5.46 to −2.44, p < 0.00001) than isCGM (MD −1.79 mmol/mol [−0.16%]; 95% CI: −5.28, 1.69, p = 0.31).