marginally significantp = 0.059
The main effect was marginally significant: F (2,172) = 2.87, p = 0.059, partial η 2 = 0.03.
The main effect was marginally significant: F (2,172) = 2.87, p = 0.059, partial η 2 = 0.03.
However, the descriptive statistical results still showed a trend whereby participants in the MI condition ( M = 4.73, SD = 0.95) make less ambiguously wrong judgment than those in the ME condition ( M = 4.99, SD = 0.99). 5.2.3.