a significant trendp = 0.12
However, when considering the participants’ strength levels, a significant trend was observed in the conditions for MPV: F [1,22] = 2.52, p = 0.12, np 2 = 0.10 but not for Vmax: F [1,22] = 1.57, p = 0.22, np 2 = 0.07.
However, when considering the participants’ strength levels, a significant trend was observed in the conditions for MPV: F [1,22] = 2.52, p = 0.12, np 2 = 0.10 but not for Vmax: F [1,22] = 1.57, p = 0.22, np 2 = 0.07.
Because of the exploratory nature of this pilot study and the small sample size, trends toward significance or marginal significance were considered for p -values between 0.06 and 0.15, always interpreted in conjunction with a moderate or large effect size, as well as the practical or applied relevance of the findings. 3.
Our results did not reach a significant condition × time interaction for either mean propulsive velocity (MPV) or maximum velocity (Vmax); however, a trend toward significance was observed for MPV when the participants were stratified by strength level, as indicated by a 20.41% increase in MPV without affecting Vmax.