near-significantp = 0.052
The distal-to-proximal approach showed a higher success rate (96.7%) compared to the proximal-to-distal approach (76.7%), with a near-significant difference ( p = 0.052).
The distal-to-proximal approach showed a higher success rate (96.7%) compared to the proximal-to-distal approach (76.7%), with a near-significant difference ( p = 0.052).