a significant trendp = 0.002
The meta-analysis showed a significant trend towards the experimental group compared to the control group (−0.71, 95% CI [-1.15 to −0.27], p = 0.002).
The meta-analysis showed a significant trend towards the experimental group compared to the control group (−0.71, 95% CI [-1.15 to −0.27], p = 0.002).
(2024) found no differences in the ISQ between the groups comparing the motorized expanders and the osteodensifying drills; however, the motorized ridge expanders proved to be more effective in expanding the ridge, with a highly significant value (p < 0.01) and achieved, after 6 months, better primary stability than the ODT.