showed a trendp = 0.085
CG showed a trend toward a larger 1RM (+2.1 ± 5.0%, p = 0.085, d = 0.11) in the bench press and a significant improvement in the back squat (+5.0 ± 6.0%, p = 0.003, d = 0.39) compared to PG ( Figure 3 ).
CG showed a trend toward a larger 1RM (+2.1 ± 5.0%, p = 0.085, d = 0.11) in the bench press and a significant improvement in the back squat (+5.0 ± 6.0%, p = 0.003, d = 0.39) compared to PG ( Figure 3 ).