highly significantp = 0.02
Specifically, TyG showed a highly significant p -value (<0.0001), followed by TyG adjusted for BMI (TyG-BMI) ( p = 0.02), TG/HDL-c ratio ( p = 0.0005), AIP ( p = 0.0005), CMI ( p = 0.008), and CRR ( p = 0.02). 2.3.
Specifically, TyG showed a highly significant p -value (<0.0001), followed by TyG adjusted for BMI (TyG-BMI) ( p = 0.02), TG/HDL-c ratio ( p = 0.0005), AIP ( p = 0.0005), CMI ( p = 0.008), and CRR ( p = 0.02). 2.3.
Notably, the mean values for WHtR showed significance ( p = 0.02), while WHR approached significance with a p -value of 0.052.