marginally non-significantp = 0.052
After controlling for BMI and working memory (Table 2 ), DFS total remained a significant predictor of test performance (β = 0.30, p = 0.030) but DFS Fat was now marginally non-significant (β = 0.27 p = 0.052).
After controlling for BMI and working memory (Table 2 ), DFS total remained a significant predictor of test performance (β = 0.30, p = 0.030) but DFS Fat was now marginally non-significant (β = 0.27 p = 0.052).
There were no main effects of any of the diet variables, although DFS fat and DFS sugar approached significance, with higher diet scores trending towards a greater mean distance from the target.