nominally significantp = 2.34 × 10 –4
There was a nominally significant ( p = 2.34 × 10 –4 ) association in males for rs115882880, but no evidence for association ( p > 0.05) in the opposite strata for the other two GWS associations.
There was a nominally significant ( p = 2.34 × 10 –4 ) association in males for rs115882880, but no evidence for association ( p > 0.05) in the opposite strata for the other two GWS associations.
The unstratified result is also highly significant, but the magnitude of the association is stronger in females and the maternal proxy cases.