Barely Significant
← all phrases

nominally significant

448 sentences · 448 papers · 9,414 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp = 2.15 × 10 –70.0× alphagold
Although they did not survive false discovery rate correction (FDR) for multiple testing (Additional file 1 : Table S3), the nominally significant pairwise comparisons showed enrichment for π c differences related to hematological and metabolic traits (hematological fold-enrichment = 4.45, p = 2.15 × 10 –7 ; metabolic fold-enrichment = 4.05, p = 4.01 × 10 –6 ).
nominally significantp < 1 × 10 −50.0× alphagold
Cross-population transferability of loci Of the nominally significant ( p < 1 × 10 −5 ) loci in the short and long sleep duration analyses in the AFR GWAS, none reached even a nominal significance threshold of p < 0.05 in the EUR analysis, and none demonstrate a lower p-value in the cross-population analysis.
nominally significantp=0.057 −20.0× alphagold
Preliminary examination revealed a nominally significant relationship (B=−0.122, t=−1.91, p=0.057 −2 tailed) in this study, following a priori hypothesis of an association of GARS and ASI predictability of risk in which a one-tailed analysis revealed (P=0.028) for the drug severity.
nominally significantp = 0.057−20.0× alphagold
Preliminary examination revealed a nominally significant relationship (B = −0.122, t = −1.91, p = 0.057−2 tailed) in this study, following apriori hypothesis of an association of GARS and ASI predictability of risk in which a one-tailed analysis revealed (P=0.028) for the drug severity (greater than four alleles predicted unspecified drug severity risk).
nominally significantP = 0.00120.0× alphagold
In the non-EA participants (137 cases, 120 controls), rs17538288 remained nominally significant (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.22; P = 0.0012 ) and rs7546189 did not (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.87; P = 0.33 ).
Genome-wide Association Study for AKI.
Kidney360 · 2023 · PMC10371295
nominally significantp = 0.0020.0× alphagold
Nominally significant interactions between LR and HR groups were observed for correlations between YMRS total scores and left superior frontal surface area ( p = 0.002, uncorrected) (Fig. 4A ), CBCL total score and right lateral orbitofrontal surface area ( p = 0.005, uncorrected) (Fig. 4B ), and CBCL dysregulation subscale scores and right lateral orbitofrontal surface area (p = 0.008, uncorrected) (Fig. 4C ).
nominally significantp = 0.002320.0× alphagold
Although this SNP was also found to be nominally significantly associated with the estimated plasma and effect-site MECs in the present study in the additive model (combined β = −0.07784, nominal p = 0.00232, for the 0–6 h plasma MEC; combined β = −0.07517, nominal p = 0.00310, for the 0–12 h plasma MEC; combined β = −0.09432, nominal p = 0.00250, for the 0–
nominally significantP = 0.0040.1× alphagold
Among which tryptophan betaine was the most significant causal metabolite in both AF GWAS data (from Nielsen et al.) (odds ratio (OR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.76–0.90, P = 9.37 × 10 −6 ) and AF GWAS data (from Roselli et al.) (OR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76–0.88, P = 2.00 × 10 −7 ), while uridine was nominally significant metabolites in both AF GWAS data (from Nielsen et al.) (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.40–0.84, P = 0.004) and AF GWAS data (from Roselli et al.) (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35–0.88, P = 0.01).