approached significancep = 0.051
The AO condition ( M = 25.01, SD = 6.84) did not significantly differ from other conditions, though it approached significance compared to MI [ t (87.2) = 2.61, p = 0.051].
The AO condition ( M = 25.01, SD = 6.84) did not significantly differ from other conditions, though it approached significance compared to MI [ t (87.2) = 2.61, p = 0.051].
Additionally, the prediction interval indicated a positive trend in upper limb function improvement, ranging from −0.29 to 1.39.