Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Diagnostic Accuracy and Concordance of Standardized vs. Non-Standardized Joint Physical Examination for Assessing Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Paired Comparison Using Ultrasound as Reference Standard.

J Clin Med · 2025 · PMC12346904 · PMID 40806956

2
hedged sentences
0.0001
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0800
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.0001actually significant
Conversely, when false negatives were regarded as more critical, the standardized examination again yielded a substantially higher average kappa (0.59, SE = 0.023) relative to the non-standardized method (0.45, SE = 0.027), with this difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.07 to 0.21.

also in 132,142 other papers

did not reach statistical significancep = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Regarding joint swelling, in scenarios where false positives were prioritized, the average kappa for the standardized examination was 0.457 (SE = 0.023) compared with 0.40 (SE = 0.028) for the non-standardized examination; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.08), as the 95% confidence interval (−0.007 to 0.112) included zero.

also in 111,027 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.