Barely Significant
← all excerpts

AlloDerm Vs DermACELL in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of All Head-to-Head Comparisons.

Aesthet Surg J Open Forum · 2025 · PMC12358236 · PMID 40832133

2
hedged sentences
0.0600
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0600
boldest claim

The sentences

approached significanceP = .06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Infection Rates Regarding infection rates, the pooled analysis indicated no statistically significant difference between the AlloDerm and DermACELL groups, although the trend approached significance (RR = 1.32, 95% CI, 0.99-1.75, P = .06) for slightly higher rates with AlloDerm.

also in 8,237 other papers

a trend toward significanceno p-value reported
9 Swisher et al investigated outcomes between DermACELL and AlloDerm in breast reconstruction and found no significant differences in complication rates, including implant failure, skin necrosis, hematoma, and red breast syndrome, with the latter showing only a trend toward significance. 12 Their study included fewer studies, which may influence the breadth of data analysis.

also in 3,729 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.