showed a trendp = 0.077
In younger patients (< 65 years), only T2DM (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10–1.97, p = 0.009) was significant, while SIDM showed a trend (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.98–1.52, p = 0.077).
In younger patients (< 65 years), only T2DM (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10–1.97, p = 0.009) was significant, while SIDM showed a trend (HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.98–1.52, p = 0.077).