highly significantP = 1.6 × 10 −4
This model proved to be highly significant (χ 2 compared to the constant model: 17.51, P = 1.6 × 10 −4 ; table S6).
This model proved to be highly significant (χ 2 compared to the constant model: 17.51, P = 1.6 × 10 −4 ; table S6).
PRN silencing showed a trend ( P = 0.06, Tukey-Kramer post hoc test) for reduced awakening probability, while silencing the BF alone was not significantly different compared to sham stimulation ( P = 0.14, Tukey-Kramer post hoc test).